tL
Posts : 12
Join date : 2009-05-09
 | | Subject: >sBs< vs. *pWp* 5/30/09 (Cont.) Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:01 pm | |
| Here's the one I meant to post Reap:  | |
|
Dave
Posts : 39
Join date : 2009-05-03
Age : 39
| | Subject: Re: >sBs< vs. *pWp* 5/30/09 (Cont.) Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:21 am | |
| 140-41=100/4 = 25
sBs: 100
pWp: 25 | |
|
eclipse
Posts : 20
Join date : 2009-05-04
| | Subject: Re: >sBs< vs. *pWp* 5/30/09 (Cont.) Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:05 am | |
| | |
|
ReAper
Admin
Posts : 386
Join date : 2009-05-01
Age : 40
Location : Pennsylvania
| | Subject: Re: >sBs< vs. *pWp* 5/30/09 (Cont.) Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:49 am | |
| We're going to buy Dave's calculator a new battery!  <3  Thanks Leg, I was wondering what was up with that doublepost - all makes sense now.  | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: >sBs< vs. *pWp* 5/30/09 (Cont.) | |
| |
|
